@leahfileson X · 2026-09-11
A tamper-evident, on-chain timestamp of what this post said. Captured 2026-09-13 21:29 UTC.
Yesterday, @TheGrayzoneNews released a leaked contract showing TPUSA's sponsorship deal with an Israeli govt-aligned org. So I followed the money. And @AndrewKolvet has some explaining to do.... In May 2025, Charlie Kirk was in the worst fight of his life, and not with the left. It was with his own donors, over Israel. We know because his texts leaked and Turning Point confirmed they're real: "Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I cannot and will not be bullied." That same month, May 16, someone at Turning Point signed a contract. First question I had, no way Charlie signed this. I was right, his name is nowhere on it. The sponsor is the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They are an American charity, $318 million a year, milked mostly from elderly Christians watching TV, closely aligned with the Israeli government, and already renting space inside Fox, Daily Wire, Newsmax, Levin, and Cruz. They bought the boomer audience, so this contract is them buying our kids. The deal: $700,000 with the first $300K due June 1, 2025, two weeks after signing. RED FLAG 1: "Exclusivity Category: Jewish/Israel Nonprofit." That's rate-card language. You don't invent a category for one customer. Turning Point had an Israel lane FOR SALE, and this sponsor bought every seat in it through 2027. Interesting considering their mission, but moving on... RED FLAG 2: "Israel Activism Kits" shipped to 200+ campuses with the sponsor holding "Creative Collaboration and Approval," plus a "Collaborative Campaign for week of October 7th." Every year through 2027. So, a youth charity sold a foreign-aligned sponsor approval rights over what its own student chapters hand out, and nobody handing it out was ever told. Okay. RED FLAG 3: The last page: "everything in this agreement is confidential." Sponsors pay to be SEEN. You only hide the terms when the terms are the product. What did the NDA protect? The price, the category, the kits, the list access. RED FLAG 4: The signatures. The sponsor sent its U.S. CEO. Turning Point's line reads "Strategic Partnerships," and a staffer one year out of college signed it. It's the same boilerplate they use for exhibitors, the one with a $100 fine for opening your booth late. A $700K influence deal moved through a $115 million organization on sponsor booth paper with no officer's name within a mile of it. Executives don't negotiate with coordinators. This looks like intentional routing and doesn't make sense. Now the timeline, because it's brutal: - June 1, 2025: the first $300K comes due - July: Charlie puts Tucker on the main stage of the FIRST sponsored event anyway - Aug 6, 2025: The same day the second sponsored event opens at Rancho Palos Verdes, Charlie goes on Megyn Kelly and says donors are telling him he's "no longer with us." - Sept 6: his biggest pro-Israel donor pulls $2M a year at a private LA dinner - Sept 8: Kirk asks for a "DOGE" like assessment - Sept 10: Charlie Kirk is assassinated - Five weeks later: the contract's October 7th campaign window arrives, under new leadership that inherited every obligation and canceled nothing RED FLAG 5: The second $200K came due June 1, 2026. The exact stretch when Andrew Kolvet was insisting there was no "foreign" money and that TPUSA "cannot accept" it. He never "we don't have an Israel-aligned sponsor under NDA." He engineered that to be technically true while the Fellowship contract existed. But, it makes sense considering before Turning Point, public filings list Kolvet as VP of Communications at The KAIROS Company, Rev. Johnnie Moore's PR shop, where Kolvet was the named media contact for the Jerusalem Prayer Team and Friends of Zion. Professional Christian Zionist messaging was his actual job. KAIROS distributed press for the Fellowship itself, and Moore's endorsement is on IFCJ's website right now. But yeah, keep talking, Andrew. And is the sponsor's name in the new FY2025 990? Of course not, and that is intentional and why it took a leaked document. Nothing here says anyone killed Charlie. What it says is that his own org was being sneaky about selling the exact thing he was publicly refusing to sell, right through the summer they buried him. The real questions: who wrote clauses a first-year staffer never could? What else is still under NDA? This is one small leaked contract, I'm guessing based on their financial patterns established over a decade of 990s, that this isn't the only one. And every lawsuit they keep threatening comes with discovery, and discovery opens the books, opens their communications, opens contracts, opens governance, and best of all...opens financials.
Verify it yourself: the manifest is the exact JSON whose
SHA-256 is 8ab1a806104985754e717c696468244aa47aa4e1ca085b738fc2a011135217bb; it binds the tweet id, author, post time, and the SHA-256 of the text above. Re-hash the text to match ad2647f7efb543b6edd86e43c206c7e51816c0dc09d57b0ad5689f25a52bd385, and read the anchor transaction's OP_RETURN
bsv.cx / x1 / 8ab1a806104985754e717c696468244aa47aa4e1ca085b738fc2a011135217bb — the block's timestamp proves the post said this at or before that time,
with no trust in bsv.cx. Content archived via the X API.
