@CsTominagaon X · 2025-07-16
A tamper-evident, on-chain timestamp of what this post said. Captured 2026-09-07 17:38 UTC.
I can't imagine either Epstein or any of his friends or clients would ever want BSV. BSV doesn’t allow you to make things vanish. You can’t “accidentally” lose client lists, you can’t pretend transactions never happened, and you can’t route things through ephemeral shadows and call it privacy. BSV keeps a record. Permanently. Indelibly. If a single entry surfaces, the entire network of transactions can be traced. That’s what terrifies them. With BTC and Lightning, the whole idea is plausible deniability. Vanish when convenient. Hide behind layers. But BSV? It doesn’t let you run. You can obscure the view for a moment, but the trail’s always there, waiting. That’s why they don’t want it. That’s why they attack it. Because BSV ends the era of silence bought with dirty money.
Verify it yourself: the manifest is the exact JSON whose
SHA-256 is 237e4d669b23f4afe01f40e55e205588bfdec4391c5a4ed8b870124f18e73b72; it binds the tweet id, author, post time, and the SHA-256 of the text above. Re-hash the text to match d18c22ea4ba9fee00c145d1513640f9b7558a584747546d8f405737f075d8189, and read the anchor transaction's OP_RETURN
bsv.cx / x1 / 237e4d669b23f4afe01f40e55e205588bfdec4391c5a4ed8b870124f18e73b72 — the block's timestamp proves the post said this at or before that time,
with no trust in bsv.cx. Content archived via the X API.